[debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] about recent bug reports and BTS

[Osamu Aoki]

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:29:12PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> severity 285885 important
> thanks
> 
> Sorry, I meant important and not serious.  I don't think this bug is
> RC but it is more serious than an ordinary bug.

Hey, no problem.  Here is some constructive discussion.

This report caused me to go to the web page to see the bug reports and
found the new patch on the other bug report.

These reassignment bug report contents usually do not get forwarded to
the maintainer.

As much as you were surprised by the fact I send reassign message etc.
which you did not get from me, I was in the same situation.

I did not get any message from you on this bug except very cryptic
reassign report from BTS like:

|> reassign 413873 userv
|Bug#413873: Bit of documentation missing
|Bug reassigned from package `debiandoc-sgml' to `userv'.

This is not good enough message.  This may require some correction on
BTS mail message.  I wish I recieved message like:

|> reassign 413873 userv
|Bug#413873: Bit of documentation missing
|Bug reassigned from package `debiandoc-sgml' to `userv'.
|Please see http://bugs.debian.org/413873 for its history.

Anyway, I will upload fixed package.

As for 285885, I will appreciate if you can fix this bug as a very
capable developer.  I am only doing simple correction and language
support.  This is the area I am not touching and unable to fix.

I see some DTD structure being strange but changing them causes existing
documents.  (<example. tag not allowed right after <sect> etc.)  Thus I
am very reluctant to change any DTD.

Osamu