[Freedombox-discuss] need for concensus or not

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:40:51PM +0200, paxcoder wrote:
>On 10/10/2010 03:19 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 08:15:48PM +0200, paxcoder wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 03:23:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>>>If we were hired in a company to reach a common goal, then yes, it 
>>>>>>really would make sense for us to agree ahead on what that common 
>>>>>>goal was.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, compare with the debian project : it's not a company, but its 
>>>>>dev do have common goals.

>>>http://release.debian.org/squeeze/goals.txt
>>
>>Ah, yes.  Release goals, not development goals: Not defined prior 
>>to starting development, but during.
>
>Yes, you've got me there. Because Debian is a "free", "universal 
>operating system". Well played. Of no use to anyone, but well played.
>FreedomBox - a project for building whatever.

Are you here to throw sarcasm, or are you here to contribute?

Please be constructive.

If you find it constructive to try define rules for this project, then 
please do that.

There is no rule(!) here to not define rules - just me worrying that it 
is of no use.

So please do discuss those rules, goals, whatever.


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20101010/ba7c55fb/attachment.pgp>