RE : 0.39 beta

[Mildred Ki'Lya]

On 11/17/2009 10:31 AM, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
>> Or we could have the same kind of options ?
>>     
> As thay said when you develop your how makefile, you are facing the same problem already solved by the autotools in the past.
> the more you put in your Makefile the less it is readable.
>   
The autotools put much more things in the Makefile than there is in our
current Makefile :)
> One advantage of the autotools is that it is "well" known by distributors.
>   

EXCEPT: Lisaac is so simple to compile that learning the autotools, do
it right, and explain how it works to the rest of the team will take too
much time compared to just write the make dist* or whatever you need.

>> > But before doing a change, is there a real problem with the current system ?
>>     
> maintenability ?

Just how ?

if Lisaac becomes more complicated to compile (and by that I mean far
more complicated). Perhaps we will think of the autotools. For now, I
don't think it is a good solution.


Mildred

-- 
Mildred Ki'Lya
╭───────── ｍｉｌｄｒｅｄ５９３＠ｏｎｌｉｎｅ．ｆｒ ──────────
│ Jabber, GoogleTalk: <mildred at jabber.fr>
│ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>           GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B
│ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091117/8b633d4a/attachment.pgp>