Idea about deferred slots

[Pierre-Alexandre Voye]

Mildred's right. I talked about this with Benoit, and we agreed that this
verification have to be a default behavior.
It's important, because I can't (in a communication way) justify the lack of
this feature.

2009/10/15 Mildred Ki'Lya <ml.mildred593 at gmail.com>

> On 10/14/2009 02:52 PM, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> > You can easily semulate interface but putting all slot of a prototype
> defered.
> >
> Sure, but P-A was saying that if you do that the compiler won't check
> that ALL the slots are implemented.
> That would be nice to have a compile time error instead of a runtime error.
>
> Well, I think -all-warnings shows the deferred slots, so that's not that
> much a problem.
>
> --
> Mildred Ki'Lya
> ╭───────── ｍｉｌｄｒｅｄ５９３＠ｏｎｌｉｎｅ．ｆｒ ──────────
> │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: <mildred at jabber.fr>
> │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>           GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B
> │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>
>


-- 
---------------------
Isaac Project - http://isaacproject.u-strasbg.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091015/d456da93/attachment.htm>