[Logcheck-devel] Bug#299701: Moving a rule to its package ? [Fwd: Suggestion : include /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/sympa in sympa package]

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Ronny Adsetts <ronny.adsetts at amazinginternet.com> [2008.04.17.1010 +0200]:
> Personally I'd prefer it to be distributed with logcheck. When you
> have a centralised log server running logcheck, it's rather
> painful trying to get rules set up when packages ship their own
> logcheck rules.

This is not what logcheck was designed for.

Anyway, I don't want to come across as dictating what can and cannot
be done.

Ronny, if you are using logcheck extensively, maybe you could help
out a bit with the packaging?

The basic rule remains: those who do get to decide how to do it. :)

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
it's as bad as you think, and they are out to get you.
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080417/cae565cf/attachment.pgp