[Logcheck-devel] Bug#299701: Moving a rule to its package ? [Fwd: Suggestion : include /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/sympa in sympa package]

[Ronny Adsetts]

martin f krafft said at 17/04/2008 09:34:
> also sprach Ronny Adsetts <ronny.adsetts at amazinginternet.com> [2008.04.17.1010 +0200]:
>> Personally I'd prefer it to be distributed with logcheck. When you
>> have a centralised log server running logcheck, it's rather
>> painful trying to get rules set up when packages ship their own
>> logcheck rules.
> 
> This is not what logcheck was designed for.

Seems like a sensible way to use it to me. :-).

> Anyway, I don't want to come across as dictating what can and cannot
> be done.
> 
> Ronny, if you are using logcheck extensively, maybe you could help
> out a bit with the packaging?

I dunno about extensively, but sure. Wanna point me in the direction of stuff that needs doing? I'll have a look at the outstanding bugs later today.

> The basic rule remains: those who do get to decide how to do it. :)

Indeed.

Ronny
-- 
Ronny Adsetts
Technical Director
Amazing Internet Ltd, London
t: +44 20 8607 9535
f: +44 20 8607 9536
w: www.amazinginternet.com

Registered office: UK House, 82 Heath Road, Twickenham TW1 4BW
Registered in England. Company No. 4042957 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080417/01d5c47c/attachment.pgp