netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus
martin f krafft
madduck at debian.org
Tue Jan 8 11:32:29 UTC 2008
As you may know, netconf sports a control socket with which you
can control a running instance of the daemon. The idea is that tools
like /sbin/ifup then are nothing more than clients of this socket,
issuing the right commands to the daemon process.
Currently, the netconf control socket is implemented using,
a pseudo-rfc822-based protocol (see  for some information).
Many people have suggested using dbus for this, but I always refused
because I did not want the dependency. I always wanted to make dbus
optional, i.e. provide netconf-dbus which, when installed, links
netconf in with the dbus infrastructure. However, that would be
independendent of the control socket, for which I still need
While working on Ikiwiki, it dawned on me that I really ought to be
using XML RPC for this . Why? Because it's already
there to do exactly the kind of thing I am doing, and standardised.
Furthermore, dbus *is* XML RPC.
Python (netconf is currently prototyped in Python) makes XML RPC
trivial and does not introduce any new dependencies, except for
python-dbus, if I want to use dbus instead of simple XML RPC.
However, I do want (someone) to port netconf to C or C++ once I am
comfortable with the design. In order to parse XML with C/C++,
netconf would need to depend on e.g. libxmlrpc++0 or even
libdbus-1-3 - static linking is out of the question for I'd prefer
not to die a long and painful death caused by the security team.
I want netconf to eventually replace ifupdown and thus become part
of Debian's base system. Thus, I need to strive for minimal
dependencies, and thus the XML RPC library needed by a C/C++
incarnation of netconf is a thorn in my flesh.
Do you think that a libdbus-1-3 or libxmlrpc++0 dependency would be
a showstopper (given how dbus is becoming a standard)?
Or do you hold the opinion that there should be no question and dbus
is the way forward?
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
micro$oft windoze is like an air-conditioner:
it breaks down if you open a window.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/attachments/20080108/d147825c/attachment.pgp
More information about the netconf-devel