Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package
Loïc Minier
lool at dooz.org
Fri May 15 09:17:56 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Perhaps it's better to advertize the use of mk-build-deps and keep our
> > own implementation (which needs to avoid extra deps) minimal?
> What are the extra dependencies? I use only “sed” which is already used
> in pbuilder (“head” can be avoided).
I'm speaking of the extra dependencies of mk-build-deps.
mk-build-deps: makes what you want, depends on stuff which we don't
want to install in pbuilder chroots (e.g. equivs,
debhelper)
pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude: doesn't make what you want, but
doesn't depend on extra stuff
We can't switch pbuilder from pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude to
mk-build-deps because of the deps; I'm not tempted to make
pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude more complex if you have another
option (mk-build-deps).
--
Loïc Minier
More information about the Pbuilder-maint
mailing list