Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

[Junichi Uekawa]

Hi,

At Fri, 15 May 2009 11:17:56 +0200,
Loïc Minier wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > >  Perhaps it's better to advertize the use of mk-build-deps and keep our
> > >  own implementation (which needs to avoid extra deps) minimal?
> > What are the extra dependencies? I use only “sed” which is already used
> > in pbuilder (“head” can be avoided).
> 
>  I'm speaking of the extra dependencies of mk-build-deps.
> 
>  mk-build-deps: makes what you want, depends on stuff which we don't
>                 want to install in pbuilder chroots (e.g. equivs,
>                 debhelper)
>  pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude: doesn't make what you want, but
>                                    doesn't depend on extra stuff
> 
>  We can't switch pbuilder from pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude to
>  mk-build-deps because of the deps; I'm not tempted to make
>  pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude more complex if you have another
>  option (mk-build-deps).

I'd agree, let's leave pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude alone.

-- 
dancer@{netfort.gr.jp,debian.org}