Mass rebuilds for transitions: why only lib*-perl?

[Damyan Ivanov]

-=| Dominic Hargreaves, Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:10:54PM +0000 |=-
> I'm wondering whether we shouldn't test-rebuild more than just
> lib*-perl. Surely anything build-depending on perl could be tested if
> we wanted?

+1. Even more, considering the discussion about not following the 
lib*-perl naming schema for application packages going on on 
debian-perl.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/attachments/20110214/de8af162/attachment.pgp>