[Pkg-clamav-devel] Fixing #506114 by a separate upload or together with other stuff?

Michael Tautschnig mt at debian.org
Mon Nov 24 01:25:32 UTC 2008


> This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > #506114 is about status_of_proc, which is not defined in etch's lsb. Somehow I
> > > missed that point when fixing the original bug report. Anyway, a fix for that is
> > > easy and only applies to etch-volatile. Should we thus have an upload to
> > > etch-volatile fixing that one only (a volatile2 version then) to later have some
> > > further stuff which should go in both unstable and etch-volatile nicely
> > > synchronized? That is, -2 would have very much the same changelog and patches
> > > for both of them?
> > > 
> > > If nobody objects I'd do an upload within the next 24 hours.
> > > 
> > 
> > This has been further discussed with Stephen on IRC and we came to the agreement
> > that in general not each and every commit should be merged from unstable to
> > etch-volatile.  As such it doesn't make sense to have a separate upload.
> 
> Hmm, I thought what we agreed on was that we didn't need to pull the
> changes to the milter init script, but the translations cleanup was
> harmless, and the status_of_proc fix was important.  Sorry if I wasn't
> clear earlier - I'm on call this weekend, and a little distracted.

Oh, sorry, I claimed a bit too much, and rather gave my opinion. Still,
there will not be a separate upload.

Best,
Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20081123/46df4e1a/attachment-0001.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list