two dev branches?

Sven Mueller debian at incase.de
Fri Sep 17 08:22:53 UTC 2010


Ondřej Surý schrieb:
> That's probably not true even for large organisations. If you have your (murder) infrastructure in place, you're not going to replace everything.
> 
> Anyway I think we should really push things forward. I was sleeping for some time, but I could probably throw some resourses to finishing the 2.3 version. BTW It will not hit squeeze anyway.

Right, we can't hit squeeze, but I think it would be good if we at least
would make it to squeeze-backports soon ;-)

But, regretfully, I don't have time to work on this.

Regards,
Sven

> On 2.9.2010, at 4:44, Benjamin Seidenberg <benjamin at debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 09/01/2010 03:20 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
>>> I'm guessing that most people who are upgrading a mail server are
>>> upgrading the hardware, too.  
>> Please provide a basis for that assertation. I think that that's
>> probably true for large installations, but for many small
>> businesses/organizations it is not.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel mailing list
>> Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel mailing list
> Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel




More information about the Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel mailing list