Priority of libsasl2-modules

[Roberto C. Sánchez]

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:55:08AM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> 
> Therefore, I'm lowering the priority of the -modules package to
> optional. Please attach arguments based on policy to any complaints, so
> that we can approach ftp-master with more than an opinion :)
> 
I remember struggling mightily with libsasl a while back because I had
no -modules package installed (only finding out after many hours of
trying to cause dents in my desk with my forehead).  However, the
requirement for having a -modules is clearly documented in the
README.Debian.  I would wager that the vast majority of the people who
know enough about system administration to setup a case where they
absolutely positively need a -modules package to have their setup be
useful, also know enough to go looking for the README.Debian.

So, in short, I agree that we can safely make it optional.

Regards,

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20070424/4c689db4/attachment.pgp