[pkg-fso-maint] shared library in binary-package?
heiko at sntech.de
Tue Sep 8 08:24:14 UTC 2009
Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> > - Make sure you don't provide shlibs. The only reason to have a shlibs
> > file is so that packages can declare a dependency on the shared
> > library; since there shouldn't be anything doing this, having the shlibs
> > will only invite accidents.
> Note that package we've just uploaded does provide an shlibs file.
> Probably we should remove it.
I have prepared a new revision of fso-usaged to not create and install the
shlibs-file (and also the postinst and prerm modifications of it).
Also I'm wondering if the rest of your mail really reached Steve, as I'm
seeing only pkg-fso-maint as recipient here.
More information about the pkg-fso-maint