[pkg-fso-maint] shared library in binary-package?

Heiko Stübner heiko at sntech.de
Tue Sep 8 08:24:14 UTC 2009

Hi again,

Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> >  - Make sure you don't provide shlibs.  The only reason to have a shlibs
> >    file is so that packages can declare a dependency on the shared
> > library; since there shouldn't be anything doing this, having the shlibs
> > will only invite accidents.
> Note that package we've just uploaded does provide an shlibs file.
> Probably we should remove it.
I have prepared a new revision of fso-usaged to not create and install the 
shlibs-file (and also the postinst and prerm modifications of it).

Also I'm wondering if the rest of your mail really reached Steve, as I'm 
seeing only pkg-fso-maint as recipient here.


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list