[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#743460: Bug#743460: cabal-install: New upstream version available

Alex Rozenshteyn rpglover64 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 04:02:27 UTC 2014


Ah. I had been wondering why it hadn't made it into unstable, despite being
released. That makes sense.

I think a libghc-cabal-dev package is a good idea, since cabal's update
cycle is faster than GHC's, but it does seem like it might have problems.

I'd be glad to test it out, if you do decide to take that route.

Thanks.


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Joachim Breitner <nomeata at debian.org> wrote:

> Dear Alex,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 02.04.2014, 19:57 -0400 schrieb Alex Rozenshteyn:
> > Package: cabal-install
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > Version 1.18.0.3 is available, while version 1.16.0.2 is the latest
> > version packaged.
> >
> > 1.18 had some major improvements, most notably sandbox support.
>
> thanks for the report. cabal-install-1.18 requires Cabal-1.18; Cabal is
> shipped with GHC and GHC-7.6 provides Cabal-1.16. When GHC-7.8 hits
> unstable, we can upgrade cabal-install.
>
> (If this is too much an annoyance we might experiment with having a
> separate libghc-cabal-dev package, and see what goes wrong.)
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
>
>
> --
> Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
> Debian Developer
>   nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
>   JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
>



-- 
          Alex R
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20140404/4caeb1a9/attachment.html>


More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list