jack Debian packaging?

[Reinhard Tartler]

Free Ekanayaka <freee at debian.org> writes:

>   FS> Because the actual package name transition has been made, most binary
>   FS> packages will continue to be installable (for example csound, which I
>   FS> maintain, does not build-depend on libjack-dev but still depends on
>   FS> libjack0), but they will FTBFS anyway.
>
> If we go down this route, I think it makes sense to remove the
> libjack0.100.0-0 transitional package as well. That will make the
> binary packages you mention uninstallable, but as they must be
> re-uploaded anyway without the libjack0.100.0-dev build dependency,
> that shouldn't be a problem.

oh, I thought we were only taking about the libjack0.100.0-0
transitional package. Yes, let's get rid of both of them in the next upload!

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4