jack Debian packaging?

[Felipe Sateler]

El 18/03/09 18:23 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> El 18/03/09 07:13 Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> >
> > oh, I thought we were only taking about the libjack0.100.0-0
> > transitional package. Yes, let's get rid of both of them in the next
> > upload!
>
> We shoul probably get an ack from the release team before uploading. I will
> write now to debian-devel and BCC debian-release.

While writing the e-mail and preparing the list, I looked over the packages 
and found that some didn't make the transition. In fact of the packages still 
depending on libjack0.100.0-0, only one (amsynth) was uploaded after the new 
jack package was uploaded. These are the packages: 

  timemachine
  meterbridge
  libjackasyn0
  ladccad
  ladcca-bin
  jackeq
  horgand
  galan
  creox
  brutefir
  bitscope

I checked creox, and it still works. I can't check them all because my link is 
crappy. However, given that neither of these packages has seen an upload 
since at least 2006, I wonder if they are still necessary and properly 
maintained. Some of these have alternatives (galan and creox are sound 
processors, we have lots of them), others maybe not (libjackasyn0).

Here is the dd-list of these packages. Should we do something about them?

Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <geiger at debian.org>
   brutefir (U)
   ladcca
   libjackasyn
   meterbridge

Debian Multimedia Team <debian-multimedia at lists.debian.org>
   jackeq

Free Ekanayaka <free at agnula.org>
   brutefir
   creox
   horgand

Free Ekanayaka <freee at debian.org>
   jackeq (U)

Robert Jordens <jordens at debian.org>
   bitscope
   timemachine

Nick Rusnov <nickrusnov at debian.org>
   galan


Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20090318/72ab567c/attachment.pgp