[Pkg-phototools-devel] udev rules ???_prefixes

[Mark Purcell]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> For a start, the ???_ prefixes have been superseded by ??- prefixes
> which are used by other distributions as well.

Marco,

Is this policy/ best practice documented?

Should bugs be filed against packages which still do this:

025_libgphoto2.rules
025_logitechmouse.rules
035_kino.rules

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080711/de538367/attachment.pgp