[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Re: [Pkg-ruby-extras-commits] r1215
- in packages: . tioga tioga/branches tioga/branches/upstream
vincent.fourmond at 9online.fr
Sat Dec 16 15:23:43 CET 2006
Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Author: fourmond-guest
>> Date: 2006-12-16 14:25:22 +0100 (Sat, 16 Dec 2006)
>> New Revision: 1215
> Please, try to map the source (package) names to the module that is
> required to use this library. This is the current convention (and I
> know it should be formalised better soon).
OK. I'll know for next time, but this package has been in Debian for a
while, and I don't think it is a good idea to change the source package
name now that it is in the archive (correct me if I'm wrong).
I have another package (source name qt4-qtruby, already in the
archive) to integrate to the SVN repository. Should I change the source
package name ?
And what should we do in case there are mostly programs in the package
? (but in Ruby)
> So "require 'foo'" -> libfoo-ruby
> and "require 'foo/bar/baz'" -> libfoo-bar-baz-ruby.
This should definitely be mentioned on the 'Ruby Policy' draft found
on the website.
Vincent Fourmond, PhD student
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers