[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Bug#158554: Separate ZODB package status?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Fabio Tranchitella <kobold at debian.org> [2005.08.10.2041 +0200]:
> Why do you think modularize zope packages using different ZoDB is a good
> idea?

Because of code duplication. For the same reason that we e.g. make
Plone depend on CMF rather than just include the entire Plone
tarball content in the package (and thus make Plone use its own CMF
code).

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"in a country where the sole employer is the state, opposition means
 death by slow starvation. the old principle: who does not work shall
 not eat, has been replaced by a new one: who does not obey shall not
 eat."
                                                 -- leon trotsky, 1937
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-zope-developers/attachments/20050810/1621cc6a/attachment.pgp