[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: zope-debhelper and zope-common (was: (no subject))

[martin f krafft]

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> [2005.03.09.1352 +0100]:
> While I think dropping (teh current!) Zope package is a good idea it would
> be definitely not good for Sarge.  Perhaps we should do the same like Pyt=
hon
> packages and provide zope2.6, zope2.7 and zopeX.Y while having one zope
> package which just depends form the *default* zope version.  On the other
> hand we should make sure that keeping to many versions of Zope would only
> be confusing for our users ...

I do not understand why we provided zope2.7 anyway. Why not upgrade
2.6 to 2.7? There are not that many differences, are there? Sounds
to me like 2.7 should have lived in experimental for a while first.
zope3 will be its own package, that's for sure.

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCLvktIgvIgzMMSnURAoxSAKDtYCvPUEXjq/yn+uNyvP5w49hzBgCgqkR5
C+1P90gl4MCx/StFkVnSFTk=
=KgAK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--