[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: zope-debhelper and zope-common

[martin f krafft]

--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Igor Stroh <igor@rulim.de> [2005.03.09.1402 +0100]:
> Someone on #zope@irc.freenode.net told be that it would be a good idea to
> introduce zope2.8 as a new package, since it has a whole bunch of changes
> and some of them render packages which worked in zope2.7 unuseable...

Rather than that, we should ask ourselves whether there is any
benefit in introducing these packages for each minor version.
Instead, I think we need to push a policy, add lintian/linda checks,
and coordinate better with all packagers.

And we should make better use of experimental and/or upload to
unstable with conflicts against all zope-dependent packages, and
only remove them as packages get fixed.

I still like the idea to integrate at least the main packages
(zope/cmf/plone/archetypes/formulator/xuf/...) into an alioth
project and coordinate efforts.

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCLvm6IgvIgzMMSnURAsgYAJ47SlNfbEY4WXp1zE4qHhY7ID91HwCgplYs
o9mPzcLq6njCV3OVuThxRKo=
=YH31
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl--