[Debian-ha-maintainers] state of debian-ha

[Ferenc Wagner]

Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes:

> Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 17:27, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez at gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I think it worth pushing pacemaker to unstable as soon as possible so
>>>> people can start testing the stack and reporting bugs.
>>>
>>> Agreed.  One thing keeping back the Pacemaker package is the licensing
>>> of its documentation.  It's GFDL, so we should check that it does not
>>> contain invariant sections.  I don't know how to do that, though.
>>
>> Could we simply repack and drop the documentation by now or something?
>
> After a fresh look, I suspect that this licensing discrepancy might be
> unintended.  I sent a question to the ClusterLabs users list asking for
> clarification.

Got it: the actual license is CC-BY-SA-3.
I'm cleaning up my packaging repo and checking the TODO.
-- 
Regards,
Feri.