[Pkg-security-team] Fwd: Websploit packaging
Marcos Fouces
mfouces at yahoo.es
Fri Aug 26 21:50:51 UTC 2016
Hello
I apllied all your suggestions and corrections. Anyway, there are two
missing recommends that cannot be satisfied: metasploit and mdk3.
Eder is already working on metasploit but it should be good that someone
packages mdk3 (IMHO far easier to package than metasploit).
Cheers. Marcos
El 26/08/16 a las 16:32, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>> I just uploaded the package to the git repo. Please review it and tell me if
>> there is something wrong, missing...
> So I looked at the package.
>
> - if you have ${python:Depends} (and you use dh_python2), then you don't
> need "python" in Depends
> - I see you added many Recommends, can you document why they are needed?
> And some of them are clearly wrong:
> - ettercap-common: websploit uses "ettercap" so you need to recommend
> a package providing ettercap: "ettercap-text-only|ettercap"
> - nefilter (package does not exist): typo for netfilter? in which case
> you might want to depend on "iptables"
>
> FTR I usually document Recommends/Suggests like this:
>
> Recommends:
> # used by modules/mitm.py
> dsniff,
> # used by modules/arp_poisoner.py
> iptables,
> ...
>
> In the debian directory, you package-prefixed files (websploit.install)
> and files without prefix (docs). Please standardize on always using
> package-prefixed files.
>
> So rename debian/docs into debian/websploit.docs and debian/manpages into
> debian/websploit.manpages. You can remove debian/dirs as the directories
> listed there are automatically created by dh_install.
>
> Apart from those details the package looks good.
>
> Cheers,
More information about the Pkg-security-team
mailing list