[Pkg-security-team] Fwd: Websploit packaging

Marcos Fouces mfouces at yahoo.es
Fri Aug 26 21:50:51 UTC 2016


Hello

I apllied all your suggestions and corrections. Anyway, there are two 
missing recommends that cannot be satisfied: metasploit and mdk3.

Eder is already working on metasploit but it should be good that someone 
packages mdk3 (IMHO far easier to package than metasploit).

Cheers. Marcos


El 26/08/16 a las 16:32, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>> I just uploaded the package to the git repo. Please review it and tell me if
>> there is something wrong, missing...
> So I looked at the package.
>
> - if you have ${python:Depends} (and you use dh_python2), then you don't
>    need "python" in Depends
> - I see you added many Recommends, can you document why they are needed?
>    And some of them are clearly wrong:
>    - ettercap-common: websploit uses "ettercap" so you need to recommend
>      a package providing ettercap: "ettercap-text-only|ettercap"
>    - nefilter (package does not exist): typo for netfilter? in which case
>      you might want to depend on "iptables"
>
> FTR I usually document Recommends/Suggests like this:
>
> Recommends:
> # used by modules/mitm.py
>   dsniff,
> # used by modules/arp_poisoner.py
>   iptables,
> ...
>
> In the debian directory, you package-prefixed files (websploit.install)
> and files without prefix (docs). Please standardize on always using
> package-prefixed files.
>
> So rename debian/docs into debian/websploit.docs and debian/manpages into
> debian/websploit.manpages. You can remove debian/dirs as the directories
> listed there are automatically created by dh_install.
>
> Apart from those details the package looks good.
>
> Cheers,




More information about the Pkg-security-team mailing list