Bug#384019: Please comment the license of vim manual and reference
Carlos Z.F. Liu
carlosliu at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Aug 21 12:14:23 UTC 2006
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Some "procedural" comments. Please file a bug about that against
> vim-runtime and Cc the bug report in this discussion, this will let the
> debian vim maintainers follow the discussion; alternatively please at
> least Cc the maintainers' mailing list (Cc-ed with this message).
>
thanks, done, http://bugs.debian.org/384019
> > They use OPL because some parts of the manual are come from the book
> > "Vi IMproved - Vim" by Steve Oualline. The Open Publication License
> > applies to this book.
>
> Are you sure this is the reason why they use that license?
>
> Looking at ":help manual-copyright" does not give any hint that this is
> the case, it just states that parts of the book are in the manual and
> that the book is under OPL as well.
>
Oops, you are right, thanks for the correction.
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
http://wiki.debian.org/CarlosLiu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060822/cb6958c3/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers
mailing list