[Python-modules-team] Bug#736878: python-django: Please provide python3-django

Brian May brian at microcomaustralia.com.au
Tue Jun 24 07:05:41 UTC 2014


On 24 Jun 2014 16:51, "Raphael Hertzog" <hertzog at debian.org> wrote:
> It doesn't look clean to have python-django recommends python3-django just
> to have django-admin and django_bash_completion. I believe it would better
> to move them to a "python-django-common" package, no?

I can't see how that would help. You would still need to depend on
python3-django.

Alternatives would work for django-admin but probably overkill.

Hmm. Might be possible to replace django-admin (it is small) and make it
use python3-django with Python3 if installed else python-django with
Python2 somehow?

> And we could/should move to that common package all the non *.py files
> like *.po, *.mo, *.html, *.css, *.gif, *.png, *.json, *.js, etc.
>
> Django is relatively large, I don't like duplicating files when it's not
> really needed.

Yes. Moving files around makes me nervous however probably a good idea.

> In any case, feel free to commit your work to subversion, we can always
> improve furter before upload.

Will do so. Might have to wait until tomorrow now.

> Why is that needed? Most tools create the required directories on the fly.

I got a error at one stage. Confusing. Probably should remove it and see if
I still get this error.

Thanks for your feedback.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20140624/6b7c667c/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list